9 min read

Wired vs. Wireless Andon Systems: Pros and Cons

Compare wired vs. wireless Andon systems. Pros and cons, installation, reliability, scalability, and which is right for you.

Andon systems come in two fundamental architectures: wired and wireless. Each approach has distinct advantages and trade-offs that affect installation, operation, and long-term flexibility.

This article compares the two approaches across key dimensions—installation, reliability, maintenance, scalability, and cost—to help you determine which is right for your facility.

How Wired Systems Work

Wired Andon systems connect call buttons to a central controller through physical cables.

The architecture resembles traditional nurse call or intercom systems:

Wired systems have been standard in manufacturing for decades. Many plants have existing wired alert systems—often for safety or emergency communication—that predate modern Andon implementations.

How Wireless Systems Work

Wireless Andon systems use radio frequency (RF) communication between components.

The typical wireless architecture includes:

Call buttons that transmit RF signals when pressed. Buttons are battery-powered and require no wiring—just mounting in position.

A transmitter that receives button signals and relays them to pagers. Industrial transmitters cover significant range:

"The transmitter gives you a range of about three quarters of a mile, allowing it to go from either end of the building."

Pagers or watches that receive alerts from the transmitter. Responders wear these devices and receive vibration or audible alerts.

Optional signal repeaters that extend range when needed:

"The call buttons have a range of 100 to 150 feet to the transmitter. If it's further than that, if it's in a different level, or if you have a button in a different building, then you have to add a signal repeater."

Power requirements are minimal:

"That transmitter's just hooked up to a power source."

No network infrastructure is required for basic operation—just a standard electrical outlet for the transmitter.

Pros and Cons of Wired Systems

Advantages of Wired Systems

Very reliable signal transmission. Wired connections don't suffer from radio interference, signal degradation, or range limitations. Once installed and working, wired systems are extremely stable.

No battery management. Wired buttons draw power from the cable. There's no need to monitor, charge, or replace batteries.

No range considerations. Anywhere you run cable, you have full functionality. Distance from a central controller doesn't affect performance.

Integration with existing infrastructure. Facilities with existing wired systems (emergency alert, intercom, etc.) may be able to leverage that infrastructure.

Disadvantages of Wired Systems

Complex and expensive installation. Running cable requires conduit, electrical work, and often professional contractors. Installation disrupts operations and takes significant time.

Difficult to relocate or reconfigure. Moving a wired button means moving the cable. Production line changes, equipment relocations, or layout modifications require rewiring.

Fixed infrastructure. The wiring defines what's possible. Flexibility is limited by where cables were originally run.

Disruptive installation process. Cable runs may require shutting down areas, cutting into walls or floors, and coordinating with facility maintenance.

Pros and Cons of Wireless Systems

Advantages of Wireless Systems

Easy installation. Mount buttons where needed, plug in the transmitter, configure the software. No electricians, no conduit, no cable runs.

"You can place that in the production floor in a central location near those buttons to maximize your distance."

Flexibility and reconfiguration. Moving a button means physically relocating it and updating the software. Layout changes don't require rewiring.

Non-disruptive deployment. Wireless systems can be installed during normal operations without shutting down production areas.

Lower upfront cost. No wiring labor or materials. Equipment costs are typically lower than wired alternatives.

Scalability with range options. Different transmitter sizes accommodate different facility sizes:

"The bigger transmitter, because it's usually used for manufacturing and it covers a good distance around... the one that you currently have is for small office for just the immediate area."

Disadvantages of Wireless Systems

Range requires planning. Wireless systems have limits. Large facilities or those with multiple buildings may need signal repeaters. Obstructions (thick walls, metal structures) can affect range.

Battery management. Responder pagers require charging:

"Battery life for pagers is estimated at 8-12 hours depending on usage."

This creates an operational consideration:

"Make sure that each one is charged for at least that shift."

Equipment can move—sometimes unintentionally. Wireless devices are portable, which is usually an advantage. But:

"Some of the equipment, I don't know, they've relocated and I don't even know where it's at."

Buttons and pagers can be moved, misplaced, or lost. This requires some operational discipline.

Signal interference potential. Though rare in modern systems, RF interference is theoretically possible in environments with heavy radio traffic.

Installation Considerations

Wired Installation

Installing a wired Andon system involves:

Timeline: Weeks to months depending on scope.

Wireless Installation

Installing a wireless system involves:

Timeline: Days, often operational same day as equipment arrives.

Many facilities can self-install wireless systems without vendor technicians on site.

Reliability and Maintenance

Wired System Reliability

Once installed and tested, wired systems are extremely reliable:

Maintenance is minimal—occasional inspection of connections, replacement if cables are damaged.

Wireless System Reliability

Wireless reliability depends on proper setup:

Modern wireless systems are highly reliable when configured correctly. Most issues stem from installation (range problems) rather than the technology itself.

Ongoing maintenance includes:

Scalability Differences

Scaling Wired Systems

Adding stations to a wired system means running more cable. Each new button requires:

Cost per new station is significant. Expansion should be planned well in advance.

Scaling Wireless Systems

Adding stations to a wireless system means adding devices:

Incremental cost is relatively low. Expansion can be reactive—add capacity when needed.

Cost Comparison

Wired System Costs

Higher installation: Labor and materials for cable runs often exceed equipment costs. Professional installation is typically required.

Lower ongoing costs: No batteries to replace, no charging infrastructure. Once installed, operating costs are minimal.

Expensive expansion: Each new station carries significant installation cost.

Wireless System Costs

Lower installation: Equipment costs dominate. Self-installation is often possible.

Ongoing operational costs: Battery replacement, chargers, occasional device replacement.

Economical expansion: Adding capacity is straightforward and relatively inexpensive.

Over a 5-10 year horizon, total cost of ownership may be similar—but the cost profile differs significantly.

Decision Framework

Choose Wired When:

Choose Wireless When:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable?

Both can be highly reliable. Wired systems have an edge in environments with heavy RF interference or extreme distances. Modern wireless systems are reliable for the vast majority of manufacturing applications.

Can wireless cover large facilities?

Yes, with proper planning. Industrial transmitters cover up to three-quarters of a mile. Signal repeaters extend range further. Very large facilities may need multiple repeaters, but coverage is achievable.

What about interference?

Modern wireless Andon systems operate on frequencies designed to minimize interference. In typical manufacturing environments, interference is not a practical concern. Facilities with unusual RF environments should discuss with vendors.

Can I mix wired and wireless?

Some vendors offer hybrid solutions. If you have existing wired infrastructure in part of your facility, you may be able to add wireless coverage in other areas. Discuss integration options with vendors.

Making Your Decision

The wired vs. wireless decision comes down to priorities:

Most modern Andon implementations are wireless. The flexibility, lower installation cost, and ease of deployment make wireless the default choice for manufacturers adding capability to existing facilities.

Wired systems remain appropriate for new construction, high-reliability requirements, or facilities with existing wired infrastructure to leverage.

Explore Andon System →


Related reading:

Ready to see it in action?

Learn how our Andon system can help your manufacturing floor.

Explore Andon System